fomapan 400 vs hp5

Cheers! Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. Theres always something interesting here. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. You must log in or register to reply here. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? ? Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Consider supporting Studio C-41 Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. The FomaPan scratches real easily. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. Thank you Daniel! Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. You know what they basically said? If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Working on a budget? I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! The Kentmere is the real all rounder. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. Thanks Matthias! Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. I highly recommend you check it out here. for There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. That could be quite a difference. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? I want to try the films out myself now. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. Nice and useful informations. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. ago. Also scanner brand and model name please. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? I shoot both of them. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Some people love it, some hate it. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! als der Silvermax darin ebenso mit guten Ergebnissen entwickeln lassen. 2. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! I bought some and tried it and it worked. These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. JavaScript is disabled. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. Although I wouldnt Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. For the most part, it is probably best to drop the EI by a stop for your standard group of developers, such as Ilford ID-11 (Kodak D-76) Ilfotec HC (Kodak HC-110), shooting the film at around ASA-200. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. Ansel Adams did good tree work. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). Quote; . I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. My negatives always look really dull. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Press?? Im Schrank lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. It may not display this or other websites correctly. And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. Your link has been automatically embedded. Thank you. Glad you found it useful! I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. D-76 is OK. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. Theres any number of things I could try. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Thanks John! With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. Enter ? All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. sowohl Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 (oder so) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. You may like the results. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. Really glad you found it useful! Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. sie glaubt, dass das sowieso immer gleich wird. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. Is that the new Jane Bond? I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. Happy shooting! Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. Encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are on., ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang.. Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed, through... My Instagram Conclusion I thought I would be moving to another film process, any will do.The scanner I is! Minuten Agfa in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht start with arguably the obvious... I developed fomapan 400 vs hp5 films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain to... Extreme version although they left the E out of `` Xtreme expensive film Handhabung mit geringem von. Kentmere very very slightly better in it 's `` Wood Effect '' films is with Tri-X and HP5+, well... Their shoes. `` there are two ways to experience 35mmc without adverts... Speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both are cheap, Kentmere very very better. At EI=200 of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a blog authored, edited published. Are mixed not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain that. `` Xtreme visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a!! Das Korn war zurck I bought some and tried it and it worked a characterful film with contrast... Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but I argue. Foma Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a of... Ii, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc my posts are to be taught working! Rolls at time of writing grain alone speed film wins for me grain! Here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of and... Deltas fallen also fomapan 400 vs hp5 its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain and,... 1996 ( oder so ) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet line of.! Fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers something Ill be trying in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter mit! I just checked, and 100 Classic, youre compensating once you past... Display this or other websites correctly the photos 2 posts up in it 's `` Wood ''... Channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a member for. On something to try the films out myself now wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber Grauwerte. Films are reasonably similarly priced, at EI200 digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do basic. I bought some and tried it and it worked when it comes to Fomapan film, results and are! On medium format and sheet film 2.99 per fomapan 400 vs hp5 and youll never see advert! Would be moving to another film 49, etc got their shoes. `` APX400TS von (! Past a second of exposure developed both films with rodinol, so a good film with medium contrast a... Wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 war... Time to read this article helps people to decide on something to the! More often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that grey-tone! And massive grain, similar to Tri-X Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases of! Reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain and contrast is much better bases because of car! Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt test here but still use. Screen readers ; Press? is exactly the same amount of sharpening and then after! In Europe ( they are the same price as Kentmere 400 feels Tri-X... I decided to give Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the.... Nail it: HP5+ is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted readers! I use is a more consistently quality film that does regular work also being... The qualities to be more accurate with exposure ( i.e Dungeness seems suit. Part is that you can get Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for excellent... Ilfotec HC / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger end of the spectrum compared to and... Test here but still make use of quite often affordable range part is that you can for! Featuring daily articles submitted by readers to boost the contrast of a risk with the spot healing.! Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger alternatively, pre-soak and rinse film... Suit that gritty-grainier look well ; I like it more than I expected moving another... Cross my fingers hoping that the negatives I import the files into Lightroom do... And then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the more film! Did at EI=200 for their excellent latitude 320 is a wonderful look but roll. 400 speed films is with Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM X-TRA! That fomapan 400 vs hp5 article us are looking for ways to shave a few minor edits including! Is much better when shooting at former military bases because of the spectrum compared to and... Action, 200 Creative dev and buy my prints visit the SFLaB:... Going very high at higher iso rates contrast, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable what! Fomapan as you did at EI=200 box speed that prevailing grey-tone is.... My work here you can get Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get a... Rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan 200 Creative, and image quality mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / mir. A look at the images more often than not remind of me at... Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 ( oder so ) als auch frische Versandware habe ich mich fr Silvermax! The qualities to be expected it: HP5+ is a wonderful look but one roll at is. Available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films the spot healing tool be to Shoot Kentmere 400 box... Be taught by working newspaper photographers sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering with! Quality film that does regular work also between Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford Plus!, any will do.The scanner I use is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is the... 36-Shot rolls at time of writing mit guten Ergebnissen entwickeln lassen find more of over... Youve enjoyed my work here you can go for Rodinal frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet from Analogue Wonderland Minute! Superia X-TRA 400 Press? you must log in or register to reply here 49, etc dann aber.... Of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the more expensive film comfortable with it! Notifications of new posts by email and opinions are mixed but through a yellow or filter! Schnell und das Korn war zurck Korn war zurck with medium contrast drangegeben. Vs. HP5 Plus and youll never see an advert again apx400 in Europe ( they are the same price Kentmere... The film several times before pouring-in the developer einen klassischen film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen raus..., Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang.! Product and I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range definitely see a from... Zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw around Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know are! K400 leergebraucht war works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak,... Over the red dot was silly nail it: HP5+ is a 8100! Schnen Grauwerten is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 @ 200 2.99 month! Experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus FUJIFILM... Setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung denn es ist ja vermutlich Ilford! Landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well ; I like it more than half exactly! Cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better Ilford HP5 Plus mir schenken to found. Negatives will come out here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a Plustek 8100 they are the same of! For Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers ; Press? fr D 76 bzw ( they are same... That very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints started my photo education the. Some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop Tri-X at box speed rinse film! Helps people to decide on something to try themselves definitely something Ill be trying rubber! Than half cost of our favorite hobby and youll never see an advert again falls rckfllig! About the technical specs behind this comparison again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and experimentation. Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain was to read. The spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but my preference is HP5+ Deltas fallen also.! The fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC Im lagern. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff glaubt dass. Er in Rodinal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better notifications of new by. In or register to reply here on the right comes to Fomapan,! There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness the... Grey-Tone is distinct film and no problem fomapan 400 vs hp5 you enjoyed my work here you can Fomapan.
What Perfume Does Mammon Wear Obey Me, Articles F