grumman tiger vs cessna 172

The club uses, and pays $6,000 a year, but Greg noted that Florida is an expensive, to insure an aircraft because of hurricanes and the fact the state is highly litigious. Also See: Cessna 150 vs 172; Cessna 180 vs 185 The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. Everybody was used to flyingCitabrias, which as you know is fully aerobatic, Greg said. The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. With the assistance of aircraft designer Roy LoPresti, the airframe was cleaned up to reduce drag, the horizontal stabilizer was enlarged to increase elevator authority and expand the CG range, and fuel capacity went from 37 to 52 gallons. 2. first Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. In the early 90s up to the when the Flying Educators sold the Citabria in 1995, the hourly rate was $21 wet, and the monthly club dues were $42. your fairchild is also glued together and older than that. There should be few problems with maintenance for either of these aircraft types. This isn't chump speed, since the AA-5, by virtue of its slab-sided honeycomb panel fuselage, is hardly slick in the drag department. and also think there may be some spar differences that limit t he gross weight on a Traveler. Depends. 2023 The Grumman Owners and Pilots Association. He enjoys researching obscure aviation history and serves as a judge for the National Intercollegiate Flying Association. With a power setting of 2550 rpm to 2600 rpm, Mike usually cruises between 135 and 138 knots. News From HQ: Old, New, and You. Accordingly, AA-5s are quick to convert a light nudge of the yoke into an instant change in attitude. Die Grumman-Tiger-Familie im Steckbrief AG-5B haben eine praktische, auf beiden Seiten aufklappbare Cowling und ein verbessertes Heizungs- und Lftungssystem. Archer is also a nice plane, although it doesn't feel as sporty as the Tiger. Its hard to beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to fun. Id take a Tiger or a Cheetah over a 172, every day of the week. The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. Apologies for the shakiness.Aircraft: Grumman AA-5B Tiger, Cessna 172R Skyhawk \u0026 Eurocopter AS355 TwinStarTime of Day: 2:53 PMDate: November 2nd, 2022 If you are also correspondingly heavy, you could also have an issue with weight and balance. Very rugged, durable and dependable. I'll PM you another one. Greg noted that on a named. This is at least the third Tiger thread in two days. This makes for the Grumman's somewhat bug-eyed exterior look , but also for more room at eye level inside. Its roll rate is faster than a Piper or Cessna. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. Indeed, unlike most comparable aircraft, there are no moving parts inside of an AA-5s wingall flap and aileron actuation is achieved via easily accessible torque tubes upon which each control surface pivots. Among thedifferencesare enginesize,with variations from 115 hp to 180 hp, and whether the wing spar is metal or wood. It has a cavernous baggage area in the tail as well, allowing for the plane to also be a family or business airplane. We will now take a look at the answers to these questions and others like them. Small ruder for X wind landing, more than one landed on nose wheel and met their demise not that other aircraft don't. front so youve got good visibility, and, like the Champ it is derived from, it is an easy, forgiving airplane. First flown in 1955, more 172s have been built than any other aircraft. Insurance should be similarly straightforward. All rights reserved. It was developed from the 1948 Cessna 170 but with tricycle landing gear rather than conventional landing gear.The Skyhawk name was originally used for a trim package, but was later applied to . Thank you for being a part of the Cessna 172 Club! The Cessna 172. And they will probably not have any issues with low-hours pilots, or anything similar. Bombardier Challenger 350 Guide and Specs: Is It Up to the Challenge? https://www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-and-ownership/aircraft-fact-sheets/cessna-150, https://executiveflyers.com/cessna-150-vs-172/, https://www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https://singleenginepilot.com/the-most-affordable-single-engine-planes-our-top-9-picks/, Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and Specs. We havent had any major problems with the Tiger.Aero on Demand said annuals without squawksrun about $1,200 depending on the going rate in your part of the country. Nicest one Ive ever seen. Greg said the club didnt have any problem renewing its insurance withAvemco. Its nimble in the air, seats four, and has a good cruising speed with minimal fuel burn. The Citabria is a derivative of the Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion Aircraft Corporation. moved! Similar four-seatGrummansinclude the 150-hp AA5 Traveler and AA5A Cheetah, and the 160-hp GA7 Cougar. assistance. Helen is an expert in all things aviation! For more than 30 years, the 10-member club owned a Citabria. Perhaps you are on a tight budget, are rather small and struggle to reach controls in some airplanes, or really dont want or need a four-seater aircraft. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle., In the Flying Educators early years, economy was paramount, he added. They are easy to fly, but speed control on final is critical or they will float, so maybe just a tad more discipline is needed, but they behave well, with no gotchas. Moving to the Grumman Tiger meant they could have a four-place aircraft better suited for cross-country travel and still have a plane that was responsive. People tend to step on the seats just a problem of not knowing how to get in the plane, I believe the wing is a time life item and the end of the plane. In the year or two Greg was in the club while it operated the Citabria, there were no new members without prior tailwheel experience. 180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. This helps tremendously because all of the cost of ownership, flight and maintenance are all shared equally among the 4 partners. This quote has been neglected and underrated for years now . One letter called the new Cessna 172 "the rough technological and stylisticequivalent of a 1966 Chevy Novaat the price of two Mercedes." Another called the announced $124,500 base price of the new Skyhawk"incredible" and suggested that $75,000 or $80,000 would be appropriate. "Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. https://thepilotsplace.com/forum/login. Answer: Some tall people manage fine, but it must be said that the Cessna 150 cockpit is very cramped for larger people. But we were both fairly small, and we did have to limit ourselves to only a small amount of luggage, so as not to find ourselves with weight and balance issues. Early models through the 1970s can be purchased starting around $35,000 with prices increasing to about $95,000 for a newer model produced after 2000. Which engine did he install? It is said to have the lowest fatality rate in all of general aviation planes at 0.56 per 100,000 flying hours. Enter your email and click on the I am a It continued to look good until it was sold. Our Citabria wasnt re-covered during the time Flying Educators owned it, Greg said. I this video, I take my friend Dominick to Bakersfield to pick up that C. The Skyhawk and Cherokee families have long served as the go-to solution for economical four-place aircraftand more-powerful, complex machines like those from Mooney and Beechcraft have defined the top of the single-engine-piston market. Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected,andthere can be rusty tubes in the tail. Grumman Tiger. The lineage began with Jim Bedes homebuilt BD-1, which first flew in 1963. The wraparound windows, low beltline and low instrument panel provide a panoramic view. ", Surprisingly, the Citabria was used for cross-country trips more often than you would think, but only if arrival time requirements werent challenging, Greg said. I believe the wing is a time life item and the end of the plane. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle.. The Cessna 150-152 and light taildraggers have been the stalwarts of basic, entry-level aviation. Bede designed the two-place BD-1 with an emphasis on speed and economy, and when it was purchased by American Aviation and developed into the AA-1 series, these qualities were carried over. Members only needed a current medical, current flight review, CFI checkout with logbook entry for the club aircraft make and model, and at least 10 hours in tailwheel aircraft. If you plan to carry heavy loads, you should go with the Cessna 172. Aircraft Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria and the Grumman Tiger, FAA publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook'. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krishs interview. All was in order etc, just don't know much about the plane. I've already got a bird that will eat a Tiger up.. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Tiger owner here. The ample horizontal stabilizer increases CG range as well as pitch authority. The Cessna 150 was discontinued in 1977. At the end of the day, Greg noted that most members fly solo or with only one passenger and, for that reason, the airplane has to be fun to fly, and it is. The Cessna 172 Skyhawk is an American four-seat, single-engine, high wing, fixed-wing aircraft made by the Cessna Aircraft Company. While the difference between the two is by no means huge, the 152 is the more economical option. Members only needed a current medical, current flight review, CFI checkout with logbook entry for the club aircraft make and model, and at least 10 hours in tailwheel aircraft. The 172 is basically the big sister to the 152-it's a nearly identical airframe, just larger in every dimension to hold four people. They fly well and are comfortable. One consideration is that. We havent had any major problems with the Tiger., Aero on Demand said annuals without squawks. They're thrifty to run, simple to maintain, light on the controls and have great visibility with their sliding canopies. Join Us | Member Benefits |News| Events |Contact Us. The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. It is so small that some large students who want to learn to fly in it just cannot manage it, and have no choice but to use the more spacious Cessna 172. Before I bought my Grumman Tiger, I was in a flying club and flew a Cessna Cardinal. It holds 52 gallons and has a range of about 700 miles. Its hard to beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to fun. Answer: You wont need a lot of extra tuition, but a few hours with an instructor would really be a good idea. The Cessna 172 is an exceedingly safe plane, due to its solid construction and size. Its very responsive. I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. However, there are still a huge number being flown. Depending on how much exposure it has to the sun, it will need to be replaced generally about every 25 to 30 years. Although the airplane hasnt been manufactured for quite some time, Greg said parts are easy to get. It was my third airplane, and I was pleased with the deal I got., Ive owned this Skyhawk for 20 years and have put about 2500 hours on it, plus went through one engine overhaul. ). One of the challenges is finding instructors who can teach in it whether its tailwheel or aerobatic. Ill look around later for it. Copyright 2023 Flying Media. Some smaller pilots struggle to fly the Cessna 172, while some large people find they have problems in the Cessna 150 you have to plan for fabric recovery and fabric repair. Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by BellyUpFish, Aug 29, 2011. I have been googling like a mad man learning about them. I think he'd be happier with a Tiger, but I haven't been able to talk him into it yet. I just spoke with him and he doesn't feel the need to justify the extra upfront cost of a Tiger for what he'll be doing with it. Grumman Tiger Vs Cessna 150 - YouTube Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 at + 50 kts. Pilots Operating Handbook Cessna 152- Pilots Safety And Warning . Its super tight on the controls. Devoid of rivets and corrugated aluminum, its the secret behind the AA-5s speed. They charge $90 an hour wet. https://thepilotsplace.com/contact.html. (You must log in or sign up to reply here. Find more About Us here! The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. Handling is much better, I think, with lighter roll and pitch forces, and better-harmonized controls as well as a quicker roll rate. CTAF audio is included. With full fuel, the payload is about 500 pounds or so plenty if its two people flying with luggage. Tiger owners report cruise speeds of 125 to 133 knots at 8.5 to 10 gallons per hour, while owners with 160 hp Cheetahs fly about 10 knots slower with a slightly lower fuel burn. Just went with a friend to check one out. :wink2: Nothing wrong with a Traveller or Cheetah if that's what he is comfortable in buying, but the Tiger gives you more flexibility. In the early 90s up to the when the Flying Educators sold the Citabria in 1995, the hourly rate was $21 wet, and the monthly club dues were $42. The Cessna 172 is a lot heavier and more powerful than the Cessna 150, and when I did this conversion I found the Cessna 172 difficult to manage at first. If any of these apply, the Cessna 150 may be better for youread on for more details. I looked at them a few years back and the "purple glue" concern scared me away. All spars are life-limited to 12,000 to 12,500 hours, underscoring the importance of having a detailed logbook history. I don't think you'll find any Cheetahs which weigh in at only 1314 lb empty -- 1400 is more typical. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. Finding a good mechanic that has tube and fabric experience and expertise is important, and it could be a little more challenging to find than someone used to working on 172s or Cherokees. That was its strong suit.. Compared with those from other manufacturers, the Grumman design replaces many of the cables and pulleys with torque tubes. What do I need to do? Huge windows, plus the top of the glareshield is low. Cessna Cessna 172 Technical Specifications Exterior Exterior Height: 8 ft 8 in Wing Span: 35 ft 8 in Length: 26 ft 9 in Interior Cabin Volume: 55 cu ft Internal Baggage: 30 cu ft Occupancy Crew: 1 Passengers: 3 Operating Weights Max T/O Weight: 2400 Lb Max Landing Weight: 2400 Lb Operating Weight: 1666 Lb Empty Weight: 1454 Lb They have an unnamed policy, meaning they dont have to list their members or their flight time, so anyone who joins the club is insured. To provide a more up-to-date cost perspective, the Wild River Flying Club in Osceola, WI operates a 1979 Citabria with a 150-hp Lycoming O-320. Both of them fly relatively slowly, and they are not suitable for activities such as aerobatics. And a little more economically., Mike from Aero on Demand added, Besides the RV, its the fastest 180-hp airplane out there with a fixed-pitch prop. Both are inexpensive to operate and maintain, and a lot of fun to fly. Youre going to get more airspeed out of a Tiger than youre going to get out of most four-place aircraft in that category, Greg said. The American Yankee Association is the original type club and holds regular events, including an annual convention. I am very familiar with both these aircraft types. Copyright 2023 Aviator Insider | A Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. Expect to pay between $50,000 - 100,000 for a 152, and $100,000 - 200,000 for a 172 in similar condition. AA-5B Tiger. According to Greg, the 115-hpCitabria burned about 5 to 6 gph, making it economical to operate. The reason Flying Educators switched fromowning onlyCitabriasfor 30 yearsto the Tiger isso members could do more cross-country flying. human checkbox, which will verify that you are indeed a human. Approachable Aircraft: Grumman AA-5 Series. If you touch it, its going to move an aileron or elevator, Mike said. If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platform. While the earlier AA-1s and AA-5s did not change much from year to year the AA-5B Tiger underwent almost continual improvement. However, the fun-factor overrode practicality from time to time.. That wood isn't 50 years old and it is glued to a steel frame including a roll cage cabin. Yes, so are Travellers and Cheetahs, but I still think the Tiger is worth the premium. Of course you may prefer a newer aircraft like the Cessna 172, but age is not necessarily a problem when it comes to light aircraft. If you are looking for a good all-round airplane thats easy to fly, can carry passengers, and will do most of the things any private pilot wants, then the Cessna 172 should be perfect for you. It all comes down to what your mission is. Seriously, the acquisition cost is the least of his worries. UBB Message. Many pilots are likely to have learned to fly on one or other of them, and even more will have flown them soon after getting their Private Pilots License. If you currently have an account on Pilots Place, your The Flying Educators did routine maintenance and annuals in-house with little difficulty, Greg said. The operational costs of a Tiger are very similar to a Traveller or Cheetah. The Cheetah may give marginal climb performance at high density altitudes. 1976 Cessna Skyhawk 172 Pilot's Operating Handbook, POH Manual - Used . FletchAir down at Boerne Stage (5C1) is the regional guru of Grumman. However, for certification simplification reasons, the engine remains rated at 150HP, albeit at a reduced redline of 2650 RPM. In 1976, the AA-5 Traveler was replaced with the AA-5A Cheetah. If my friend buys it, I'll get a checkout from the current owner, who is a CFI before we start working in it. Am I safe to buy a Cheetah, get IFR and build 200 hours then sell -- or will I get bored before then and wish I would have waited for a Tiger? They are both basically a means to make aerial journeys, designed for touring or simply pleasure flying. Perhaps because they are easy to fly, some pilots complain that both the Cessna 150 and the Cessna 172 are somewhat boring. Fuse to Circuit Breakers - Grumman Style: Replacing your old fuse holders with Klixon 7277-2 series circuit breakers. They are faster, handle more crisply, have a nice sliding canopy, and are a bit more unusual than offerings from other aircraft in their class from Cessna, Piper and Beech . What are the main differences between them? If you have four people, filling up to the tabs provides 38 gallons of fuel, and you should be fine for most cross-country flights. The most affordable single-engine planes. The nosewheel looks flimsy but I spoke to a former Grumman pilot that says they are quite sturdy. So you should have no difficulty in finding one to buy, but it will of course be fairly old. Enjoy!Aircraft: N474EPC172ROutro Song:Gold Skies - Liam Aidan TheFlying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but Greg would recommend the aircraft as a primary trainer. Discussion in 'Hangar Talk' started by SixPapaCharlie, Dec 14, 2015. Between 4,000 feet and 10,000 feet, depending on temperature, it gets between 8.3 gph to 9.2 gph,and youre doing 135 knots easy, saysAero on DemandfounderMichaelBletsch. They are both all single-engined metal high-wing light aircraft, which were made in large numbers by Cessna, and aimed at the private flying and training market. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. Because there are so many of them, and they have been around a long time, there are a large number of mechanics and engineers who are familiar with what needs to be done to keep them in good working order, and obtaining parts for them should not be an issue either; they are easily available, even for the older Cessna 150s. ". It will keep up with a 182. Some pilots do not, since although they can see really well beneath the aircraft in the cruise, visibility in the circuit/pattern can be difficult. Does he have it on Barnstormers, Trade a Plane etc. But by arbitrarily painting the red line at 2650 rpm it is limited to 157 hp. So which is better: the Cessna 150 or the Cessna 172? Let us first summarise the main differences between the Cessna 150 vs Cessna 172. This effectively provides Tiger speed and climb performance at the price closer to that of a Cheetah. The Citabria breed has an AD requiring a one-time inspection of the wooden spar where they have to check it for cracks. Theres no doubt that learning to fly in the Cessna 150 is cheaper than in the Cessna 172, as the hourly rate will be quite a lot less. It continued to look good until it was sold. I am not very tall, and I cannot safely fly early Cessna 172s I need two cushions in order to reach the pedals and see outside clearly, and I once had one of them slip as I was about to land! Theyre fast little airplanes.. And a little more economically.. Cheetahs are faster than Tigers. Citabria burned about 5 to 6 gph, making it economical to operate. Useful load on most of Tigers I've seen run in 900-950lb range. Both are inexpensive to operate and maintai. Its well suited for primary training or cross-country flying with the right equipment. It was largely a matter of economics, Greg said. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. If not, then which is best? One operator I flew for we had a Traveller as a run around plane to gather guys in from remote strips (cheaper to fly it than the Ag planes if they need to be there tomorrow). Krish discussed having to change some avionics, propeller, engine cowling, and after 300 hours of flying him and his partners also had to overhaul the 180hp engine, which cost a whopping $28,000. 115kts and 120kts respectively? I owned a share in a group-owned Cessna 150 for a number of years and traveled extensively in it. . It was this way even before I did the upgrades. Some smaller pilots struggle to fly the Cessna 172, while some large people find they have problems in the Cessna 150, The Cessna 172 is more expensive to buy, and also to hire, than the Cessna 150, Although both types are very safe, the Cessna 172 is said to be significantly safer. , The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krish's . Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. The Tiger has the most reliable light aircraft engine ever designed. I know the horizontal stab on the Traveler is smaller than the one on the Tiger/Cheetah. As of this writing, 13 examples are listed at a median price of $48,500, with a median airframe time of 3,500 hours. Now Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane with him. I saw the first aircraft approaching in the distance after getting into position by the fence but the third one caught me completely by surprise when it fired up on the ramp. If you had a Tiger without the autopilot, its not going to be quite as stable as a 172 or a 182. Even if you dont use the Citabria for aerobatics, there is something romantic about flying a taildragger with a stick particularly one that is light and responsive to control inputs. The bonded aluminum construction eliminates the need for rivets, so even sitting on the ground it looks sleek. But by all means give it a try and see how you get on. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. Im giving you the credit you deserve, http://precisionengine.home.mindspring.com/4plstc.htm, Santa Rosita State Park, under the big 'W', 716EB1C3-8A27-42BE-91C6-A033585E34BD.jpeg, https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/com-a-grumman-tiger-to.81264/page-2#post-1756259, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. ). The Aircraft Spotlight feature looks at an airplane type and evaluates it across six areas of particular interest to flying clubs and their members: Operating Cost, Maintenance, Insurability, Training, Cross-Country, and Fun Factor. And, if you are doing aerobatics, you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which would add a cost. login you will see the new forum. Every time I think of trading up, I have a hard time thinking of selling a really good airplane , The Cessna 150 is the best simple and economical airplane one could ask to own. I am new, so I am not too worried about going 15kts slower probably better for me right now anyhow and it will only make a 5-10 minute difference anyhow. Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by Groundpounder, Jul 7, 2018. Picture . With a fuel burn at cruise of around 5 GPH, she does better than my Chevy S10. Come join us! Greg noted that on a namedpolicyyoull pay a premium based on your least experienced pilot. Both of these aircraft are made by Cessna and are fairly similar when it comes to flying. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model. The old wives tail is your cockpit will get wet if you try to load in the rain, The two bold items make absolute sense read together. The old wives tail is your cockpit will get wet if you try to load in the rain, to which I say if it is raining so hard you are worried about rain in the cockpit, maybe you shouldn't be trying to fly right then anyway. Visibility is amazing. Flying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but Greg would recommend the aircraft as a primary trainer. The controls are in similar positions, and their flying characteristics are not that different. Former Flying Educators Club Secretary and Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft. Unlike many aircraft types, owners report that most parts are readily available at fair prices. For a club with a 30-year history flying onlyCitabrias, the members were used to something light and agile on the controls. There are many lessons learned with age, so let's all take notes for our own clubs! , The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said the. They charge $90 an hour wet. The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. It seems unique. New and experienced pilots alike enjoy Grummans fiberglass main gear, describing it as robust and forgiving. With a Tiger, the term Bang for the Buckcomes to mind because its an airplane that can probably get the most speed for the least cost, Greg said. 2023 Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. Greg pointed out thefirst Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. Man erkennt eine AG-5B auch am T-frmigen Gashebel. At the end of the day, Greg noted that most members fly solo or with only one passenger and, for that reason, the airplane has to be fun to fly, and it is. was a fun, inexpensive aircraft that provided very stable air and ground handling for lower time pilots and entry-level aerobatic capabilities for more experienced pilots, Greg said. get there? Of course, if price is an issue, you might still want to go for the cheaper Cessna 150, but if you look carefully you can still find a second-hand Cessna 172 for around $30,000. The AG-5B is uncommon, with only 150 produced as compared to more than 3,000 Travelers, Cheetahs and AA-5B Tigers. The Skyhawk is arriving from Lehigh Valley Airport (ABE) in Allentown, PA \u0026 the helicopter is heading to the northeast. The cost of ownership includes the original purchase price of the airplane, then you have you fixed cost like hangar, insurance etc. Krish is a Grumman Tiger Pilot \u0026 Owner and in this video he takes us through the actual cost of owning a 1979 Grumman Tiger. If it is a new paint job people have got stripper in the joints remember this plane is glued together and stripper in the glue is bad, make sure this did not happen. The plane cruised at around 115 mph and had about a 20-gallon fuel tank, Greg recalled. Additionally, the castering nosewheel is a simpler and lighter design than those used in most Cessnas and Pipers. Our 115-hpCitabriawas a fun, inexpensive aircraft that provided very stable air and ground handling for lower time pilots and entry-level aerobatic capabilities for more experienced pilots, Greg said. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model.
Jim Messina Lipstick, Articles G